Category Archives: SharePoint

SharePoint AppRegNew.aspx and AppInv.aspx

There are well-known SharePoint app-only service principals and ACS-based permissions. It is kind of old-school way – introduced as part of Add-Ins for SharePoint 2013 – to get unattended access to SharePoint site (application access, i.e. access without user presence). Such apps are called daemon apps or service apps or background jobs etc…

Microsoft announced retirement of ACS in 2026 and takes measures to stop using ACS in new and existing tenants. For you to smoothly switch to new, recommended Entra Id based service principals and permissions – it is important to know some details about classic app-only service principals and ACS-based permissions.

As you know, any access is a two-step procedure:

  • Authentication, when systems ensures you are indeed the one you claim you are
  • Authorization, when system grants you access to the resource, as it knows that this id is allowed to access such and such resource with these permissions

So, when it comes to deprecated SharePoint app-only service principals and ACS-based permissions, AppRegNew is responsible for authentication and AppInv is responsible for authorization.

AppRegNew.aspx

To get a SharePoint app-only service principal – you’d need to register a new one at any SharePoint site using the AppRegNew.aspx page. This page is not available from GUI, so you’d need to type the Url manually. You’d need to be a site collection admin to register a new app.

Let say, your site Url is “https://YourTenant.sharepoint.com/teams/YourSite“.
Then this appregnew page’s Url would be
“https://YourTenant.sharepoint.com/teams/YourSite/_layouts/15/appregnew.aspx

If you go to this page, you’ll see (*) something like

You’d click generate client id, then generate client secret and type your app display name. I usually use “localhost” as app domain and “https://localhost” as redirect Url.

If all good – you’d get app id (client id) and app secret (client secret) and you’d be able to authenticate to your SharePoint site.

AppInv.aspx

Providing permissions for your SharePoint app-only service principal to your SharePoint site is done using AppInv.aspx page. This page is also not available from GUI, so you’d need to type the Url manually again. You’d need to be a site collection admin to use this page.

Let say, your site Url is “https://YourTenant.sharepoint.com/teams/YourSite“.
Then this appinv page’s Url would be
“https://YourTenant.sharepoint.com/teams/YourSite/_layouts/15/appinv.aspx

If you go to this page, you’ll see (*) something like

At this moment – you need to enter app (client) id here and click lookup – so all the app metadata would be populated, then you’d need to enter Permission Request XML.
Via this “Permission Request XML” you are specifying exact permissions your app will have in this site. E.g. you can specify scope – all site collection or one specific subsite (web) or even one specific list or library. Also you can specify permissions level – e.g. read, read/write, manage or full control. This is tricky, but let me share some examples with you.

Permission Request XML for the app to have full control over entire site collection:

<AppPermissionRequests AllowAppOnlyPolicy="true">  
   <AppPermissionRequest Scope="http://sharepoint/content/sitecollection" 
    Right="FullControl" />
</AppPermissionRequests>

Permission Request XML for the app to have read access to a subsite (web):

<AppPermissionRequests AllowAppOnlyPolicy="true">  
  <AppPermissionRequest Scope="http://sharepoint/content/sitecollection/web" 
   Right="Read" />
</AppPermissionRequests>

Permission Request XML for the app to have read/write access to a list/library:

<AppPermissionRequests AllowAppOnlyPolicy="true">  
   <AppPermissionRequest Scope="http://sharepoint/content/sitecollection/web/list" 
    Right="Write" />
</AppPermissionRequests>

Any mistake in XML might prevent app access, so be very careful.

Finally, your AppInv.aspx page would look like

If you specify scope as web – you’d do it on the specific web url, e.g.
“https://YourTenant.sharepoint.com/teams/YourSite/SubSite/_layouts/15/appinv.aspx”

If you specify scope as list – you’d do it on the specific web url, e.g.
“https://YourTenant.sharepoint.com/teams/YourSite/SubSite/_layouts/15/appinv.aspx”
and after you click “Save” – there will be a page – you’ll be asked to choose a list from available web lists.

After all, you’ll be asked to confirm that you trust the app:

And after that your app (SharePoint app-only service principal) will have access (ACS-based access) to you site.

AppPrincipals.aspx

From site settings page (/_layouts/15/settings.aspx) you should be able to see apps registered on your site with “Site app permissions” or “Site collection app permissions” links available via GUI. That would be “appprincipals.aspx” page.

Unfortunately, you cannot see you app permissions here or your secret expiration time. Some date can be pulled via PowerShell with Get-PnPAzureACSPrincipal

Possible complications

After Microsoft announced retirement of ACS – you can see this message on appinv and appregnew pages:

You might also see “Your SharePoint tenant admin doesn’t allow site collection admins to create an Azure Access Control (ACS) principal” message at appregnew page and “Your SharePoint tenant admin doesn’t allow site collection admins to update app permissions. Please contact your SharePoint administrator.” at appinv page.

That’s because a recent update to Microsoft 365 (MC660075) pushed by Microsoft in Aug/Sep 2023 changes default behavior so only tenant administrators can create or update ACS service principal by default.

If you are facing issues above – or you want to switch to modern Entra Id service principals, but by some reasons you need ACS-based permissions – here is the article on “Entra Id vs ACS for SharePoint and how to survive during transition period

References

Connecting to Microsoft 365 SharePoint and Graph API from Azure Function App

Let say you need to run some code against Microsoft 365 on a scheduled basis. For this, you can use Azure Function App and timer-triggered Functions. From the code you’d call Microsoft Graph API and/or SharePoint API, so you’d need your Function to get credentials on the fly and use it to call APIs. For this – you’d have a key vault where credentials will be be stored and retrieved by functions when needed. Here we’ll create, configure and secure a scheduled Azure Function and Azure Key Vault.

First, we’ll create a resource group, e.g. “Azure-Func-Secured”.

Next, we’ll create a function app:

We’ll avoid the default “Flex Consumption” service plan (as it is Linux-only and does not support dependencies) and select “Consumption” a hosting option for now:

Runtime stack we’ll be using is PowerShell Core 7.4, but you can choose your own (options are – Python, .Net (C#), Node.js, Java). Let us leave other configuration settings by default (e.g. Enable Public access: On) for now, we’ll fix (secure) it later.

Ok, the function app has been created. Notice that app service plan, application insights and storage account, as well as some other services were created automatically under the same resource group:

Now we can create one or more functions under this function app, also we’d need to create a key vault and a registered app. Let us start with function and VS Code would be our environment of choice.

Let us start Visual Studio Code in a separate folder. Ensure you have “Azure Functions”, “Azure Resources” and PowerShell extensions by Microsoft. You’d sign-in to Azure:

and create a function project:

You’d choose “Timer triggered” function (as we need the function running on schedule), the function name would be MyScheduledFunct01 and we’d leave the default schedule as “0 */5 * * * *” – so our function will be triggered every 5 minutes.

Let us deploy the function right away and see if it works. For this, we can use “deploy” icon under “WORKSPACE” panel:

or “Deploy to function app” option from the function app context pop-up menu under the Azure “RESOURCES” panel:

After successful deployment give it some time, then check function invocations and ensure function is triggered an running:

Next, we’d update “requirements.psd1” to include Azure Key Vault and PnP PowerShell modules as it takes some time for the function app to pull in and install dependencies. Requirements.psd1:

# This file enables modules to be automatically managed by the Functions service.
# See https://aka.ms/functionsmanageddependency for additional information.
#
@{
    # For latest supported version, go to 'https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/Az'. Uncomment the next line and replace the MAJOR_VERSION, e.g., 'Az' = '5.*'
    # 'Az' = 'MAJOR_VERSION.*'
    'Az.KeyVault' = '6.*'
    'PnP.PowerShell' = '2.*'
}

And we’d update function itself to monitor if dependencies are installed, than we’d deploy the function again so time would work for us. MyScheduledFunction/run.ps1:

# Input bindings are passed in via param block.
param($Timer)
$currentUTCtime = (Get-Date).ToUniversalTime()
if ($Timer.IsPastDue) {
    Write-Host "PowerShell timer is running late!"
}
Write-Host "PowerShell timer trigger function ran! TIME: $currentUTCtime"
#############################################################################################
Write-Host "Check modules installed:"
Import-Module PnP.PowerShell 
Import-Module Az.KeyVault
Get-Module PnP.PowerShell
Get-Module Az.KeyVault
Write-Host "Check command available:"
Get-Command -Name Connect-PnPOnline -Module PnP.PowerShell

At first, we might see warning like “The first managed dependency download is in progress, function execution will continue when it’s done. Depending on the content of requirements.psd1, this can take a few minutes. Subsequent function executions will not block and updates will be performed in the background.”. So we’d just wait.

After some time the function will be able to use required modules. Here is the invocation output example:

App Registration
To get unattended access to SharePoint (or Teams or Exchange etc.) as a service (daemon) application – we need credentials. It is done via “App Registration” under Entra Id (Azure AD) – here is the detailed step-by-step guide on registering apps in Azure.

Finally, we’d have a service principal with permissions we need:

We do not hard-code secrets, so let us create a key vault to keep secrets safe:

We’d leave all other configuration option by default, including “Azure role-based access control”, Allow access from: All Networks etc.

Here is the trick: even if I created this key vault and have an admin-level access, I’m not able to work with secrets values. So I need to provide additional access to myself. Being at the key vault, navigate to “Access control (IAM)” and add role assignment…

We’d select “Key Vault Secrets Officer”, next, select members… and select own name:

From this moment you should be able to CRUD secrets with values.

Now, let us generate a secret under App registration and copy secret value:

Then navigate to the Key Vault -> Object/Secrets -> Generate/Import – and save the secret value there:

Now you can get this secret… but the function cannot reach the secret… Here is the proof. Let us update the function code with:

Write-Host "Get secret from the key vault:"
$vaultName = "azure-func-secrets"
$secretName = "azure-func-secured-01"
$kvSecret = Get-AzKeyVaultSecret -VaultName $vaultName -Name $secretName -AsPlainText
Write-Host "Secret:" $kvSecret.Substring(0,3)

and check the function output. You’d see something like (which is not very descriptive):

So, how’d we allow key vault access for the function app? It’s as simple as that:
– first, we’d need some identity assigned to function app
– second, we’d provide access to the key vault to this identity

Managed Identity: assign an identity to the function.
For this, you’d go to function Settings/Identity, and under System Assigned, you’d switch status to On and Save settings.

Then, you’d go to your key vault, Access Control (IAM) and add role assignment. But this time, you’d select the role “Key Vault Secrets User” (more about roles), and “Assign access to” Managed Identity, and select members – select your function app identity (notice, identity is assigned to function app, so all functions under the app will be able to use the identity):

Now, we’d check the next function invocation detail, and voila:

You can see that azure function was able on the fly to pull secret from the key vault, so now we should be able to use these credentials to access SharePoint.

As you know, having client id and client secret would allow you to call MS Graph API. But calling SharePoint API would require authentication with a certificate. “PnP.PowerShell” module use both APIs under the hood, so we’d need a certificate to connect to tenant and work with SharePoint using “PnP.PowerShell” module. Please refer to this article on how to run Connect-PnPOnline with Certificate stored in the Key Vault.

References:

Microsoft 365 retention policies: Static vs Adaptive scope

Adaptive scopes are good, but what if both policies are implemented? Which one wins?
The scenario for two policies might be: static retention policy is implemented as default retention policy for all sites, and if site require different retention or deletion – it should fall under one of the adaptive scopes and an adaptive retention policy will be applied.

Implementing Microsoft 365 group expiration policy in large companies

This post is dedicated to one specific subject: implementing Microsoft 365 groups lifecycle (expiration) policy in large Microsoft 365 environments.

But this post is also a part of a bigger problem – dealing with ownerless resources in Large Microsoft 365 environments. Please refer to the umbrella post.

Scenario

You administer a large Microsoft 365 environment. Let say you have 100k users or more, 50K or more sites. Environment is not new, so after some years you have a lot of ownerless groups and sites (thousands probably), and a lot of inactive groups and sites (probably tens of thousands). You are getting more and more ownerless groups – hundreds each month. You are thinking of stopping bleeding and cleaning this up…

Implementing Microsoft 365 groups expiration policy

If you are thinking of activating in an existing environment – you would probably have a spike – all the old groups will be subject to policy. The ide is to avoid situation when a specific person – group owner will get dozens of email. It would be better if a person will receieve, let say one email per week.

Here is my 4 possible approaches to avoid this spike, distribute notifications evenly across the time and ease the pain:

By changing Group Lifetime

You would need to change the policy every, e.g. week or month, specifying group lifetime in days starting with maximum period. Consider
– calculate number of days between the oldest group created an today, plus 35 days – it’ll be your first “group lifetime”
– activate the policy with this number of days in “group lifetime” – and within a week you will get notifications on the oldest group/groups
– after a week or two – change the “group lifetime” decreasing it by e.g. 30-60 days and reactivate the policy… and so on

You can easily calculate it all and choose your pace depending on how many groups you have to renew, how much time you need to clean-up. You got the idea.

Downside – in the email notification it will be said “otherwise the group will be deleted on …”, but you joggling with lifetime period – so these dates might confuse users

By renewing groups as admin

As an admin, you can use PowerShell “Reset-PnPMicrosoft365GroupExpiration” or graph API “POST /groups/{id}/renew“ to renew any group.

So depending on total number of groups, number of active/inactive groups, number of ownerless groups in your organization – you can come up with a strategy, using one or more of the following techniques:

  • renew all active and known and important groups (build list of groups to re-activate based on your own criteria) and then trigger the policy
  • build list of definitely inactive groups and renew all other groups
  • split groups into chunks and every day or week (depending on numbers) renew groups in a chunk… after that you can activate groups expiration policy, the policy will be triggered against small number of groups every day/week (with this trick you would avoid policy triggering against large number of groups and sending thousands of emails at one)

By sending customized e-mails to users

Another technique to avoid surge in your e-mail system (and most importantly – avoid sudden influx of support requests) – you can send emails to group owners with a link to renew a group. Surely you’d need to build your custom solution for that, but this does not seem like a complicated task. Some PowerShell scripting – and you are good.

“Renew group” link would look like:
https://account.activedirectory.windowsazure.com/Group/RenewGroup?tenantId=<tenantId>&id=<groupId>
where <tenantId> is tenant id and <groupId> is group Id. So with PowerShell you’d just pull groups in question, their owners and send email with the link dynamically built. Consider spreading this activity across the time to avoid spikes.

By sending users to the groups page

Probably the easies option to smooth the expiration policy implementation is to send group owners to a Microsoft “Groups I own” page – where they could renew or delete their groups. The page is:

Groups I Own (https://myaccount.microsoft.com/groups/groups-i-own)

The downside is – the policy should be in active state (otherwise owners will not see when the group is expiring and option to renew it). So consider a maximum lifetime period in policy, then you’d decrease this period).

Groups expiration policy technical details

Check this KBA for a deep dive into the groups lifecycle policy technical details.

Inactive Microsoft 365 groups, teams and SharePoint sites remediation

In Microsoft 365 any users create teams, private/public channels, yammer communities with SharePoint sites behind, as well as standalone SharePoint sites, so in time we – SharePoint engineers – are getting more and more inactive/abandoned groups, teams and SharePoint sites. Dealing with inactive Teams and SharePoint content – as part of Microsoft 365 governance – is a cumbersome, ungrateful and demanding, but necessary and also challenging work, especially in large organizations.

To keep growing content under control – Orgs can use:

In enterprises it’s most likely all of them.

Built-in Microsoft 365 group expiration policy

There is a “Microsoft 365 groups expiration policy” that comes with every tenant and can help remove unused groups from the system, but since all Teams and Yammer sites are group-based – it also helps SharePoint admins make things cleaner.

This policy does a very simple job: on a regular basis it sends notifications to group owners so a group owner can renew the group, otherwise the group will expire and be deleted. Active groups are renewed automatically.

Although it looks simple, there are some tricks and gotchas, so I highly recommend to check this article, especially if you are going to enable the policy in an existing environment.

3-rd party tools

There are many 3-rd party tools on the market that helps with Microsoft 365 administration, information management and governance, e.g. ShareGate, AvePoint, Quest ControlPoint, SysKit Point etc.

Obviously, these 3-rd party tools exist because they can do what Microsoft ootb cannot do or they can do it better then Microsoft. For example

  • Archive teams, SharePoint sites (this is a smart idea, because for instance, a site owner feels like content is not relevant anymore, but cannot take a risk to delete the site – so site owner can choose to archive the site – i.e. keep it for a while but not use it.
  • Delegate tasks to managers or to assigned groups. This is another example of careful attitude to content – e.g. if site owner fails to respond (there might be many reasons) – a tool can reach out to user’s manager or to dedicated resolution group (vs deleting resource blindly) – so somebody can act responsibly and keep the resource or archive or delete it.

Custom solutions – PowerShell scripts, MS Graph API

PowerShell is your best friend when it comes to automation or repeated work or massive updates or ad-hoc reports etc. And PowerShell is your last resort to do something unique, what no other tools can do. PowerShell is very capable and allows to build pretty complex custom solutions.

Microsoft Graph API is a rapidly developing by Microsoft API to manage and work with data in all Microsoft 365 services. You can call MS Graph API from any popular programming language, including PowerShell. Consider Microsoft Graph PowerShell SDK.

PnP – community-based project (not officially supported, but backed by Microsoft). They are doing a really good job providing us with knowledge, guides, tools and SDKs to code against Microsoft 365, including
Microsoft Graph SDK
Microsoft Graph Toolkit
PnP Core SDK
PnP.PowerShell
PnPjs

You can use PowerShell to (just a few examples, but there are more scenarios):

  • find and protect resources that you do not want to be a part of policies, but want to deal with manually, on individual basis, e.g.
    – sites or teams owned by top management
    – sites or teams with extremely large content
    – sites or teams with sensitive or other kind of important content
  • implement Microsoft 365 group expiration policy graciously, e.g. step-by-step, via small batches (e.g. updating RenewedDateTime group property would allow you to control when this group will expire and Microsoft start sending notification)
  • deal with non-group-based resources (standalone SharePoint sites), etc.

Solution stack might include VS Code, Microsoft Graph API, Azure Functions, Azure Key Vault, PowerShell, C#, PnP.PowerShell etc.

Some more things to consider on the subject

Remediate ownerless SharePoint/Teams resources.

It’s obvious that when you are trying to clean-up inactive resources – you are working with resources owners. Inactive ownerless resource will be simply deleted. That means that before implementing any kind of inactive resources policies – you’d make all efforts to find an owner for every resource to ensure that no important information will be lost in your environment.

I have multiple publications and videos on how to manage ownerless groups in Microsoft 365, including “Deep dive in ownerless Microsoft 365 groups policy“.
Here is the list of orphan Microsoft 365 resources articles.

Retention policies

Though retention policy is something that lives under Purview center (out of SharePoint scope), you should always be aware of it and consider retention configuration, so your settings do not conflict with retention settings.

Microsoft SharePoint Premium (SharePoint Advanced Management)

This is new, announced in April 2024 functionality (licensed separately). Among other benefits, it allows:

Manage site lifecycle policies – an inactive site policy that automatically detects inactive sites and sends notifications to site owners. Sounds familiar? Yes, the same as “group expiration policy” but applied to standalone also. Learn more…

Microsoft 365 Archive

Again, new functionality. MS says: “Keep your SharePoint content in Microsoft 365 with cost-effective, long-term cold tier storage – without sacrificing manageability, security, and compliance.” In fact, archived sites are no longer accessible by anyone in the organization outside of Microsoft Purview or admin search. Learn more…

Microsoft will be hiding inactive channels.

To keep users channels list relevant, Teams will automatically detect inactive channels user haven’t interacted with in a while, and automatically hide them. Users will have an option to review the list of channels and unhide some or all of them, opt out of automatic hiding from settings, or initiate this process on demand.
Feature ID: 325780

Ownerless Microsoft 365 groups policy in large environments

Usually Microsoft 365 group can be created by anyone in your org as part of creation a team, Yammer community, Outlook group, SharePoint site etc. If the group owner lefts the company and account got deleted – the group became ownerless.

It would be a nightmare if we’d reach ownerless groups members peron-to-person trying to find out who is a real data owner and who should be a group owner. So we need some kind of automated way.

There is a Microsoft’s ownerless groups policy that detects ownerless groups and sends emails the most active groups members with the question- if they want to become a group owners and in case member accept ownership – policy automatically elevates a person from a group member to group owner. Policy does not cover standalone sites, but majority of orphaned resources in org are usually m365 groups, so that policy should help.

The policy was designed to prevent ownerless groups concept in mind, i.e. to deal with ownerless groups gradually – stretched in time – when they become ownerless. So it is actually recommended to activate the policy once you get the tenant right away. Configuration is done via GUI, it is intuitive and straightforward. Microsoft documented it well, but if you still have questions regarding the policy behavior – here is my Q&A on what is not covered by Microsoft’s FAQ as well as some tips and tricks and gotchas…

The problem is that Microsoft introduced this feature just recently, and if you own the tenant for years, you probably already have some ownerless groups. In small and medium environments with a few dozens of ownerless groups it’s not a big issue, but in a large Microsoft 365 SharePoint Online environment you might end up having hundreds and thousands of ownerless (orphaned) resources you have to deal with.

The challenge is how to implement the policy correctly if there are already many ownerless groups present and then to take care of groups that will become ownerless in the future. Yes, we’d need to address two consecutive issues:

  • Remediate vast amount of existing ownerless groups
  • Prevent groups to become ownerless

Obviously we’d need two different strategies and policies configurations.

There are also 3-rd party tools – like SysKit Point that can help with orphaned resources by enforcing minimum number of owners. There is also “Orphaned resources” policy under SysKit that allows multiple workflow options to resolve the issue – but there is no “fully automated” option -all SysKit options require an interaction from admin/manager.

Microsoft 365 built-in feature – “Ownerless groups policy” allows fully automated process:

  • detects ownerless groups, and for every group found
  • generate e-mail invitations to most active group members
  • assigns users as group owners if they accept invitation

Another problem in large environments is we have strict requirements we want to satisfy:

  • end-users to get only a few emails in a certain period so they can process it
  • end-users get only relevant messages so they will not ignore further notifications
  • high percentage of acceptance and (ideally) no orphaned resources

We want the policy to be tested in production but within a small group first and then we want phased implementation – so we could have a chance to get a feedback on phase 1 and adjust our approach at phase 2 etc.

The policy allows limiting policy scope in two ways:

  • by limiting “who can receive” messages – it’s done by specifying a security group – so only this security group members will be eligible to get invitation and accept or decline it
  • by limiting Microsoft 365 groups that would be in scope for the policy – it’s done by specifying group names

Two options can be specified in the same policy and effective eligible members would be those who satisfy both requirements.

Configuration is done using GUI – i.e. there is no PowerShell commands known on the subject at the moment.

There are a lot of “what if” questions regarding the policy – most of them are resolved in Microsoft’s “Microsoft 365 ownerless group policy FAQ” and my Ownerless m365 groups Q&As, gotchas, findings…

But the most important gotcha for me is that we do not have a chance to re-configure the policy or re-activate it to get more messages for the groups all messages were generated earlier. I.e. if an e-mail messages were generated for a group and the policy stopped working after a specified period of time – it’d done forever. No more e-mails could be generated for the same group.

The other limit is you can specify maximum 50 m365 groups in policy under Apply policy to Specific groups option. And we’d keep in mind exchange’s limit of 10k emals per day.

So, having this said, what would be the proper approach to do phased implementation in terms of configuring policy to scope it down for each step?

First – know your data. Get full report on ownerless groups, analyze it and come up with approach. Let’s assume we have an org with ~100K users and ~5000 ownerless groups. I bet you will find out that you have

  • large m365 groups (50+ members): <1%, i.e. 10-20 groups
  • medium m365 groups (5-50 members): ~25%, i.e. ~1000-2000 groups
  • small m365 groups (1-5 members): ~50%, i.e. ~2500 groups
  • null m365 groups (0 members): ~25%, i.e. ~1000-2000 groups

You’d might have your own classification, but I would propose the following approach to each category.

  • large groups:
    configure policy with “Apply policy to Specific groups” option
    and specify all or several of your large groups (the limit if 50 allowed groups in this field)
  • medium groups:
    configure policy not scoped down (e.g. apply to all groups, all users)
  • small groups:
    elevate all group members to owners
    optionally – elevate specific titles (manager, lead) or salary grade members to owners
  • null groups:
    consider deleting these groups
    optionally – delete only inactive no-members groups or groups with no or small amount of storage/files.

You’d also come up with the ideas on

  • desired min and max number of owners
  • deleting groups/sites phased approach
  • archiving groups/teams/sites

Remember – this is production, so at this moment you should test the policy in non-prod an be fully comfortable with all aspects of configuring the policy and formatting e-mail template etc.

As a remediation part plan I would propose the following:

(WIP)

Wave 0 – piloting

select a few (3-5) ownerless m365 groups came from IT – whose members are your pilot team members, so you could finalize all settings and polish notification message etc.

Implement the policy with settings:

In parallel, while you are waiting weeks for the policy to pause, start developing PowerShell scripts that will 1) delete null (no members) groups and 2) elevate members to owners (get how many members can be elevated if elevate only certain members)

Track user’s response – % of declines and accepts

Get feedback from users – how well the notification message is understandable

Wave 1 – large groups and small groups

Implement the policy with settings:

In parallel, you should already know – how many members can be elevated if elevate only certain members, decide on that and and run PowerShell script that elevates members to owners.

Wave 2 – medium groups and null groups

Implement the policy with settings:

In parallel, run PowerShell script removes groups with no owners and no members (optionally inactive and/or no content).

Wave 3 – all groups left ownerless

Implement the policy with settings:

Wave 4 – permanent policy and deletion script

Implement the policy with settings:

two more moments to consider:
– After all the measures against ownerless groups is done, we will probably still have some groups ownerless
– We will be getting new ownerless groups permanently – during all the waves of policy implementation

Qestions and Answers

Q: Isn’t it a security risk if we elevate members to owners? Would a member get access to more information that he/she did have access to before.
A: 1) Elevating members is the same risk as implementing the ownerless policy, as policy does the same – it elevates member to group owner.
2) When a member is elevated to group owners – a member does not get access to more information, as
a) for standard channels – he/she did have access as a member
b) private channels stays private – new group owner dos not get access to private channels automatically
c) shared channels stays with the same permissions also

TBC

References

SPO Site LastContentModifiedDate vs LastItemModifiedDate vs LastItemUserModifiedDate vs Graph LastModifiedDateTime

How do we know when the SharePoint site was last updated?

We have multiple “when the site was modified last time” properties – e.g. some we can retrieve with SharePoint CSOM:

  • Site LastContentModifiedDate
  • Web LastItemModifiedDate
  • Web LastItemUserModifiedDate

Also we can get

  • MS Graph site object with LastModifiedDateTime property
  • get usage reports via Microsoft Graph (activity reports), and
  • use “Last activity” field via Admin Center GUI

On the other hand – we can view and modify site in multiple ways – visit site home page, open and/or update document/list item, change site/library settings, configure site permissions, assign site sensitivity label, setup site property and so on.

Question: which site “last modified” or “last activity” properties reflect what events/actions?

This might be important if we think of retention policies, or any kind of clean-up processes… Let say, we are getting report on abandoned sites (inactive sites), but we are also assigning sites sensitivity labels, or we are updating site custom properties (e.g. for adaptive scopes), we have an ownerless groups policy working etc.

What if we assign site sensitivity label to an old inactive (5 years old) site – would it affect retention policy since site was updated this way?

Results

So i did some tests and based on detailed results below, it seems like

  • Web LastItemModifiedDate is triggered when user just visited site (but property LastItemUserModifiedDate is not triggered)
  • If a document or list Item updated by user or app – all properties are triggered
  • MS Graph site property LastModifiedDateTime, root web property LastItemModifiedDate and Site LastContentModifiedDate – same values
  • If site custom property is updated – it does not affect any site “last modified” property
  • The same for sensitivity label updated by app – it does not affect any site “last modified” property
  • The same for Microsoft ownerless groups policy – when user accept or decline group membership – no site “last modified” properties are changed (the same is true for Microsoft 365 group last modified date/time property).

Please refer to the table below

Detailed test results

Test results if the event triggers property update:

EventLast Content Modified DateLast Item Modified DateLast Item User Modified DateGraph Last Modified DateTimeGUI Last activity
Page viewed by userYesYesNoYes
Home Page viewed by user
Site Page viewed by user
Document or list item updated by userYesYesYesYes
Document or list item updated by appYesYesYesYes
Site config settings updated by user
Site config settings updated by app
Site custom property updated by appNoNoNoNo
Site Sensitivity label updated by user via SharePointYesNoNoNo
Site/Group Sensitivity label updated by user via Teams
Site/Group Sensitivity label updated by user via AzureNoNoNoNo
Site Sensitivity label updated by appNoNoNoNo
Site collection admin updated by userYesYesNoYes
Site collection admin updated by appYesYesNoYes
SharePoint group membership updated by userYesYesNoYes
Standalone Site connected to a group by userYesYesYesYes
Add Microsoft Teams to Site by UserYesYesYesYes
Update m365 group membership via M365 admin console by adminYesYesNoYes
Update m365 group membership via Azure by admin
Update m365 group membership via Teams by userNoNoNoYes
Update m365 group membership via App
Accept group ownership invitation sent by ownerless groups policyNoNoNoNo
Decline group ownership invitation sent by ownerless groups policyNoNoNoNo