UPDATE: this approach only works if the mobile number is stored in SPO UPA. If the mobile number is stored in AAD only, the admin will need to remove the mobile number from AAD for the affected users.
Scenario: you administer SharePoint Online Microsoft 365 tenant business asks you to remove mobile phone numbers from SharePoint User Profiles:
Solution:
As a SharePoint administrator, you can do it: 1. Start Microsoft 365 SharePoint Admin Center 2. Navigate to More Features -> User Profiles -> Manage User Properties
3. Under “Contact Information” -> Mobile phone -> Edit
4. Uncheck “Replicable”, Save, wait a minute or two 5. – Select “Default Privacy Settings”: “Only Me” – Uncheck “User can override” – Uncheck “Allow users to edit values for this property” – Uncheck “Show in the profile properties section of the user’s profile page” – Uncheck “Indexed”
6. Save
Note: Microsoft implemented new MS-Graph API that adds or deletes profile card custom properties using the profile card API in Microsoft Graph
How can I get HTML content of a SharePoint online page from code, e.g. PowerShell?
Invoke-WebRequest returns “Sign in to your account” page, not a real page, even with -Token option.
Thanks to Denis Molodtsov, the solution is found. It turns out the “Invoke-PnPSPRestMethod” PnP cmdlet works not only against /api endpoints, but also against site pages and system pages.
But (as per my experience) it works only with PnP.PowerShell and with -UseWebLogin authentication option and with -raw parameter.
Other combination of authentication options ( -interactive, -clientId, -Token, -SPOManagementShell, -PnPManagementShell ) – worked well, but only for /_api endpoints, and gave me “401 UNAUTHORIZED” against system/site pages. Unattended authentication (with clientId, clientSecret and certificate) – same.
Legacy PnP module SharePointPnPPowerShellOnline did not work at all: “EXCEPTION,PnP.PowerShell.Commands.Admin.InvokeSPRestMethod”.
I tested it with – SharePointPnPPowerShellOnline v 3.29.2101.0 (under Windows PowerShell 5.1) and – PnP.PowerShell 1.8.0. (both Windows PowerShell 5.1 and .net core PowerShell 7.1.5)
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription with SharePoint Online. You use PowerShell, PnP.PowerShell module and MS Graph API to work with SharePoint under current user’s credential. You need to authenticate to SharePoint Online via Connect-PnPOnline and to Microsoft Graph API interactively on behalf of a current user.
Problem
Unfortunately, both “Connect-PnPOnline -Interactive -Url <siteUrl>” or “Connect-PnPOnline -UseWebLogin -Url <siteUrl>” might fail with something like “Need admin approval”, “App needs permission to access resources in your organization that only an admin can grant. Please ask an admin to grant permission to this app before you can use it.” or “Permissions requested” or similar
configure API permissions blade: – add delegatedpermissions you need (refer to specific API you’ll use) e.g. Microsoft Graph Sites.FullControl.All and SharePoint AllSites.FullControl
A pop-up window will appear to authenticate interactively. If you are already authenticated with another credentials (or single-sigh-on) – an interactive window might pop up and disappear – that prevents you enter your other id. To ensure Connect-PnPOnline prompts you for your credentials – use ” -ForceAuthentication” option.
If you are a SharePoint tenant admin – you can connect to a tenant with:
By default token expires in ~ 1 hour. But you can refresh it silently. This helps you in long-running PowerShell scripts that takes hours to complete. So you can include something like this in the loop:
Somehow using Connect-PnPOnline with AccessToken option did not work if the token was acquired with MSAL.PS interactively. But it did work when you get msal.ps token unattended (using App credentials). So…
If you can get an Application (non Delegated) permissions to your azure-registerd-app, you can use msal token to connect to site with PnP
=========================
NB: For delegated permissions, the effective permissions of your app are the intersection of the delegated permissions the app has been granted (via consent) and the privileges of the currently signed-in user. Your app can never have more privileges than the signed-in user.
Update (May 2023): You can use Get-PnPAzureACSPrincipal to returns the lists of all Azure ACS principals installed in your Tenant including subsites.
Update: Sites.Selected API MS Graph permissions was introduced by Microsoft in 2021. It was a good move towards site-level development, but still developers were limited with only what MS Graph API provides for SharePoint dev. So devs had to use AppInv.aspx at site level to provide ACS permissions to their apps to be able to use SharePoint CSOM and REST APIs. Recently Microsoft introduced Sites.Selected SharePoint API permissions for registered Azure Apps! So now devs should be fully happy without ACS-based permissions.
Update: I’m not sure when Microsoft implemented that, but I recently found another Record Type – “SharePointAppPermissionOperation”. There is an Activity type – AppPermissionGrant… To be explored…
After all the updates the original article below is probably obsolete…
Scenario
Developers in the organization can use both – Azure Apps and SharePoint Apps to work with SharePoint sites in their “daemon” applications.
It is recommended to use Azure apps so, you want to know – what are SharePoint Apps registered and their owners, who registered SharePoint Apps. Eventually you would disable SharePoint Apps-only principal but before that you’d move Devs from SP-App-only to Azure App (see Disable Custom App Authentication).
(SharePoint App-only service principals aka SP-App-Only are SPN or App registered from within SharePoint using AppRegNew.aspx system page).
One of the approaches is to track Apps/Owners (or who register an app) with Unified Audit Log
returns events with operation = ‘Add service principal.’ Nice, but… if an app was registered in Azure – event contains an UPN under UserIds property:
Unfortunately, in case with registering app in SharePoint, an audit log event will be like:
i.e. UserId registered is “spo_service@support.onmicrosoft.com”, so we do not know who registered a SharePoint-only app
In theory – we could use events recorded immediately before and after “Add service principal” event to track a user and site who has registered a SharePoint-only app… But for me it seems like too complicated for automation.
Instead we can do simple search through audit log for events “AppRegNew.aspx page visited”. This gives us a good approximation of who registered SP-App-only principal. Worst scenario – we reach more people than we really need (including those who started registering sp-app-only but did not complete) but all of them would be definitely our target auditory.
You have imported a list into SharePoint Online. Every list item contains information for specific users and users’ accounts. You want list items be visible to specific users only. You want to leverage Item-Level Permissions under List Advanced settings: “Read access: Read items that were created by the user”. But the problem is – since this list was imported – it was not users who created items. So the item-level access feature to work properly – you’d need to update the list so for each item the field “Created By” will have a user account you want the item be visible for.
Solution:
PnP.PowerShell helps. Using “Set-PnPListItem”, you can re-write “Author” field in the list item. In the example below I’m using just static user’s UPN:
There is a known problem in SharePoint (and Teams*) – complicated permissions system. Site owners/administrators provide access, site contributors upload documents and at any moment nobody knows – who has access to which files. As a result – sometimes sensitive documents become overshared (over-exposed). The biggest concern is when sites content is shared with “Everyone”. How do we know which content is shared with “Everyone”? Is there a report?
Obviously, only data owner knows who should have access to site documents, so we (SharePoint admins) do not fix permissions automatically (until there is a policy), but at least we can help site owners with reports and maybe initiate permissions review for “nasty” sites?
Below I’m sharing 4 possible solutions:
Solution #0 – Out-of-the-box EEEU report, but it comes with Premium license only
Solution #1 – also OotB report that comes with some 3-rd party tools
Solution #2 – PowerShell “Brute force” – free but require advanced skills and efforts
Solution #3 – Search-based – also free, and require less skills and efforts
(*) Microsoft with the introduction of Teams had to simplify permissions in SharePoint – since there should only be 3 types of access levels – owner, member and visitor. It was… in some ways, but in other ways it made things worse.
You are lucky if you can use 3-rd party tools (e.g. ShareGate, SysKit Point, AvePoint, Metalogix etc.), with the ability to get full permissions report. Though – if your m365 environment is not small – there might be a problem to get full permissions report for all tenant sites. Some tools allow you to get tenant-wide permissions report for specific Ids – this option should work better for large environments.
Still there might be another problem. Consider the following. When I say “shared with Everyone” – I actually mean at least 3 possible “everyone” system logins:
Everyone
Everyone except external users
All users
– those are system id’s, but what if there are other ids – e.g. migrated from on-prem or cloud-born custom security groups in tenant that also includes everyone or many users (e.g. dynamic security group that includes all org accounts)?
What if your Identity management operates security groups “All employee” or “Contractors” or “All licensed users”? Do you think these groups can be identified as “Everyone” groups? Do you think it’d be a good idea to check if content is shared with other large groups (not only system Everyone…)? Would you like to run permissions report separately for all groups that include “all” or “almost all” users?
Also, knowing that full reports heavily load the system, 3-rd party tools might by default limit “how deep report is” to the root site and lists/libraries, not including e.g. folders and items. So you might need go to settings and turn on “full deep” option Keep it in mind.
Obviously this option #1 is not free, as it requires licenses to be obtained. And still it worth to consider option 3.
Solution #2 (PowerShell “Brute force”)
You can get full permissions report per site or for entire tenant with PowerShell, which if free… The only you need is to write a script yourself or find existing one. Sounds easy?
Well, first problem is it takes a decent amount of time and competences to write such script. If if you find one – it would require some skills to adopt and run it. Frankly say, I have not seen so far scripts that were out-of-the-box ready to do that job. And it is not a good idea to run scripts you got from internet against your production environment until you understand it tested it and fully confident with.
Another possible problem – size of environment. The script I designed and use to get comprehensive permissions report might run hours against a good site – if I need full details on site/subsites, lists/libraries, folders and list items levels. So if you have less than 1000 sites – probably this approach can fly. But if your environment is 10K+ sites – it will take forever. So the approach might not work for large enterprise environments.
One might say – we can limit report with only root web permissions to get it faster. But this would be not accurate. And what is not accurate in the IT security – leads to even bigger risks. So, we need check permissions up to every item level deep, as even one file with sensitive info shared inappropriately can cause security issue. (Btw, 3-rd party tools usually by default limit reports to libraries level, so check reporting options…)
The other issue with this approach… Let say you got full permissions report… It would look like “resource -> group -> permissions”… How do you know for each group – what is the group in terms of membership?
Ok, if this solution is not easy to get working – what are other options?
Solution #3 (Search-based)
This solution is based on simple but clever idea: why do we need to iterate through all the tenant documents/items if all the content is already crawled by search? Search is also respect permissions. Can we just use search to get files shared with Everyone? Let us see.
What if we use some dummy user account with no specific permissions provided and no group memberships and try to search content on behalf of that account. The idea is if this user can see some data – then these data is open to everyone.
With this option we would use search query “*” and all 5 possible SharePoint entities – driveItem’,’listItem’,’list’,’drive’,’site’ to find everything that is shared with everyone. We’d pull results with paging (we’d use “from” option in a loop to pull all results). After we get all results – we’d select only unique site collections. But! We might have some problems here.
Problem #1. Again, for small environments or if there are not much “Open” sites – it would work. But for large enterprise environments the problem is the same as in “brute force”. Search would returns too many results – and it might take weeks (exact time is unpredictable) to get all of them. (Surely there are sites “legally” shared with everyone, public Office 365 group based sites, communication sites… So your search will be flooded with content from sites you already know are shared with all).
Problem #2. We are getting results with paging. But recently Microsoft started limiting number of returning results. E.g. your search request result might say like “there are 3659735 total hits” but after result number 1000 it just stops returning anything, even with paging.
Solution#3 Option #2 – loop sites
The idea is: why do we need to get all search results if even one result from a site would be enough to put the site to the list of “open” sites. In other words, we do not need all results from the site, we only need to know if there are any results from the site, at least one – so we know if the site is open for everyone or not.
So, consider the following approach:
You get list of all sites in tenant.
You run search request against each site in the loop (e.g. consider KQL option “Site: https://yourTenant.SharePoint.com/sites/YourSite”. If at least something found in the site – add the site to the “Open Sites” list. With this approach you will get list of sites shared with “Everyone…” in a predictable time.
Solution#3 Option #3 – exclude known “open” sites
There are sites “legally” shared with everyone – e.g. corporate portal, department communication sites, public teams, public Viva Engage communities etc. If it is know that these sites are public – you can exclude them from all sites list – so in the “Solution#3 Option #2 – loop sites” – you’d loop only through sites that are not supposed to be public. I know – percentage of “legally public” sites in tenant to all sites is a relatively small number, so should not significantly decrease elapsed time… but still.
Pros and cons of the Solution # 3
Pro 1: the only fast enough (at least predictable time to complete) and accurate enough to rely on solution.
Pro 2: There might be custom security groups intended to hold all or part of the enterprise (e.g. “All employee” or “all contractors”). If the enterprise comprises from several businesses or regions – it might be “All Business 1” or “All EMEA”… you got the idea. So you can tweak this search-based solution by adding your dummy account you are running search on behalf of to some of theses groups to find out if there are resources shared maybe not with everyone but with all “North America based” users or with “all employees”, which might make sense also.
Con 1 : crawling and indexing takes time, so search-based reports can miss recent changes in data and permissions
Con 2: this approach cannot be automated (since we need an interactive authentication). I.e. we need to run it manually every time.
Con 3: After we get all sites shared with everyone – we do not know – at what level permissions are broken and provided to everyone. It might be entire site or one file. It does not really help if you try to get all search results from the site. If you want to know what exactly is shared with everyone – on the site – run permissions report against this site (shortlist of sites).
Notes
Note 1: consider there are resources like “Styles Library” shared with everyone by default, especially on migrated sites
Note 2: this is a separate topic, but consider implementing/using sensitivity labels. At least you can start with high-sensitive sites. With sensitivity labels – site owners/member would know – what kind of site they are working on.
What’s next
Ok, we know list of SharePoint resources shared with everyone, but what would be the next step? Should we communicate to site owners – if so how to let site owners know that there are resources shared with Everyone… on their sites. To be continued…
You are a software developer. Your company uses Microsoft Office 365 (SharePoint, Teams etc.). The need is to work with a specific site collection programmatically (from code – Python, C#, Java, PowerShell, JavaScript etc.) – e.g. upload/download documents, update list items, search etc.
The code must run without user interaction (unattended, aka daemon app). Sometimes this is also called “SharePoint Automation”.
The solution is based on a new Graph API feature – Sites.Selected and a classic SP-Only app.
Solution
Register an Azure App and configure it as usual. Select API Permissions blade and add two permissions: – Microsoft Graph -> Applications Permissions -> “sites.selected” – SharePoint -> Applications Permissions -> “sites.selected“
Request “Grant admin consent” from a tenant/global admin
Request SharePoint admin to run PowerShell code (e.g. this one) to assign proper permissions to your azure app for a specific site collection (consider site owner consent)
(optionally) Provide SharePoint API permissions: (require Site Collection Owner/Admin account) – use https://YourTenant.sharepoint.com/teams/YourSite/_layouts/15/appinv.aspx to add SharePoint API permissions to your app. E.g. full control permissions to site collection would be
Sites.Selected API MS Graph permissions was introduced by Microsoft in 2021. It was a huge step forward, but still devs were limited with MS Graph API against SharePoint. So devs had to use AppInv at site level to provide ACS permissions to their apps to use SharePoint CSOM and REST APIs. Recently Microsoft introduced Sites.Selected SharePoint API permissions for registered Azure Apps! So now devs should be fully happy without ACS-based permissions AppInv.aspx. (See more here on disabling SP Apps Only SPNs)
